Know what is ready to ship and what needs work. We test critical journeys, automate checks, and document defects with evidence.
Testing is most useful when it informs a release decision. We focus coverage on real user risks and make unresolved issues visible before you approve launch.
Defect reports include context, steps, expected behaviour, and severity so fixes start with the right information.
Selected automated journeys help identify regressions while manual exploration covers changing risks.
A readiness summary shows tested scope, open issues, and coverage limits without claiming a bug-free product.
Prioritise user journeys and define supported devices, environments, and release criteria.
Configure test accounts and authorised sample data without exposing unnecessary production information.
Check primary flows, validation, permissions, and error states using documented and exploratory tests.
Build stable smoke and regression checks for selected journeys and explain what remains manual.
Log reproducible evidence, agree severity with your team, and retest fixes against affected journeys.
Summarise coverage, unresolved defects, and limitations so the release owner can make the final decision.
Coverage follows product risk and the agreed scope: functional journeys, regression, integrations, and selected non-functional checks. Specialist accessibility or security assessments need explicit scope.
For the agreed automated coverage, you receive scripts, setup instructions, and CI integration notes. We document data dependencies, maintenance needs, and cases that remain manual.
We report reproducible steps, expected and actual behaviour, evidence, and severity. Your product and engineering owners agree priority and decide whether unresolved issues block release.
No. We agree a representative device and browser matrix based on your audience, and distinguish real-device testing from emulation. Untested combinations remain visible in the report.