API Integration & Development
Connect products and business systems through documented, tested APIs. We define contracts, permissions, errors, and versioning.
Why?
A working connection needs more than a successful request. We design for retries, duplicate events, permission boundaries, and provider changes so your team can operate the integration.
-
Contracts developers can use
Document schemas, request examples, and error responses so integration work starts from a shared specification.
-
Connections built for failure cases
Plan permission boundaries, retries, duplicate events, and version changes alongside the successful path.
Our process
Map systems and data flows
Identify source systems, integration owners, data permissions, and provider constraints.
Define the API contract
Specify endpoints, payloads, validation, pagination, and consistent error responses before implementation.
Design access and failure handling
Plan authentication, least-privilege scopes, request limits, retries, and duplicate-event handling.
Implement and test connections
Build agreed endpoints or adapters and verify contracts, permissions, timeouts, and provider failures.
Document integration examples
Provide request examples, setup instructions, and a safe test approach without exposing credentials.
Prepare versioning and operations
Define change notices, monitoring, ownership, and deprecation steps so consumers can plan updates.
Questions?
Both can be scoped. We review the source systems and consumers, then define endpoints, adapters, data contracts, and the responsibilities of each integration owner.
We implement agreed authentication, scoped permissions, validation, secret handling, and request limits, then test common failure paths. Controls reduce risk but do not eliminate it.
Provider accounts, usage fees, approval requirements, and service limits are identified separately. We cannot guarantee a provider's availability, approval, or future API behaviour.
We use contract tests, documented versions, change notices, and a deprecation plan. Breaking changes require coordination and testing with consumers, not an assumption of compatibility.
