Design Systems
Build shared foundations, reusable components, and design governance, with bilingual behavior and accessibility aligned to your code.
Why?
A design system is useful when teams know which component to use, how it behaves, and how to change it safely. We connect visual foundations, component rules, documentation, and ownership so the library can be maintained after handoff.
-
Shared component decisions
Designers and developers can refer to documented names, states, and usage rules rather than interpreting each screen independently.
-
Intentional bilingual behaviour
Direction, typography, mixed-language content, and component mirroring are specified rather than assumed.
-
Maintainable design decisions
Ownership and contribution rules give the team a clear way to add patterns and retire duplicates.
Our process
Inventory the product interface
We review current screens, design libraries, and available code components to identify duplication and priority patterns.
Define token structure
We define naming and semantic roles for colour, type, spacing, and agreed themes, with implementation mapping notes.
Build component patterns
We create the agreed component set with variants, interaction states, responsive behaviour, and Arabic/English direction rules.
Write usage documentation
We document when to use each component, accessibility considerations, content rules, and known limitations.
Plan adoption and ownership
We agree on library owners, contribution reviews, release practices, and a rollout plan for the participating teams.
Review system adoption
We define adoption measures and review criteria such as component reuse, exceptions, and unresolved design-code differences.
Questions?
The proposal defines foundations, tokens, components, variants, documentation, and training. A coded component library is a separate deliverable unless explicitly included.
Yes. We review available components with engineering, map names and states, and document gaps. Code changes and migration ownership are agreed separately.
We define RTL and LTR rules, Arabic typography, mixed-direction content, and which icons or layouts should mirror. Representative components are reviewed in both languages.
We agree on a baseline and measures such as reuse, adoption, design-code consistency, and time spent on repeated work. We do not promise a fixed percentage improvement.
